ABSTRACT
La receta médica es la materialización del acto médico a través de la cual el profesional de la salud prescribe a su paciente los fármacos necesarios para aliviar su enfermedad. Existen numerosas sustancias o fármacos que, por sus efectos, no pueden ser ofrecidas al público en general si no es mediante la expedición de una receta médica; por tanto, existen numerosas legislaciones y normas que regulan la prescripción médica con el objetivo de tener un control sobre los fármacos prescritos. A su vez, la receta médica debe tener una estructura específica, misma que está establecida por numerosas leyes y reglamentos sanitarios y que interesantemente es ignorada por múltiples médicos u odontólogos. El objetivo del presente artículo es definir el concepto de prescripción médica, así como indagar en todas las leyes y normas vigentes que regulan la prescripción médica en México (AU)
The medical prescription is the materialization of the medical act through which the health professional prescribes to his patient the necessary drugs to alleviate his illness There are numerous substances or drugs that, due to their effects, cannot be offered to the general public, except through the issuance of a medical prescription, and therefore, there are numerous laws that regulate the medical prescription with the aim of having control over prescribed drugs. In turn, the medical prescription must have a specific structure, which is established by numerous health laws and regulations, and which, interestingly enough, is ignored by many doctors and dentists. The aim of this article is to define the concept of medical prescription as well as to investigate all the current laws and regulations that regulate the medical prescription in Mexico (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Forensic Dentistry/legislation & jurisprudence , Legislation, Dental , MexicoABSTRACT
Para el adecuado ejercicio de la odontología, los procedimientos realizados deben ejecutarse apegándose en todo momento a las normas y principios éticos propios de la profesión. Cuando un odontólogo decide, por voluntad propia, ejercer la profesión sin apegarse a dichos principios, se considera que actúa con negligencia. La negligencia se caracteriza por ser un acto indebido, en el cual el profesional ejecuta por voluntad propia acciones injustificables capaces de producir daños en la salud de los pacientes o en el pronóstico de un tratamiento. Los actos negligentes, además de atentar contra la integridad del paciente, ponen en riesgo a los profesionales de la salud que los cometen de sufrir consecuencias legales derivadas de dichos actos. El objetivo del presente artículo consiste en definir el concepto de negligencia, describir las formas más comunes en las que ésta se comete durante la consulta odontológica así como sus posibles consecuencias legales, ilustrándolas a su vez con la breve presentación de algunos casos (AU)
For the proper practice of dentistry, the procedures performed must be carried out adhering at all times to the standards and ethical principles of the profession. When a dentist voluntarily decides to practice the profession without adhering to these principles, he is considered to be acting negligently. Negligence is characterized as an improper act, in which the professional voluntarily executes unjustifiable actions capable of causing damage to the health of patients or the prognosis of a treatment. Negligent acts, in addition to threatening the integrity of the patient, put health professionals at risk who commit legal consequences derived from these acts. The aim of this article is to define the concept of negligence, to describe the most common ways in which it is committed during the dental practice as well as its legal consequences, illustrating them in turn with a brief presentation of some cases (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Liability, Legal , Malpractice , Dental Records , Infection Control, Dental , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Forensic Dentistry , Legislation, DentalABSTRACT
El expediente clínico es considerado un documento de importancia médica y legal en donde se integran los datos necesarios para registrar el diagnóstico y los tratamientos realizados en cada paciente. Uno de los elementos más importantes dentro del expediente clínico son las notas de evolución, documentos con los que el odontólogo informa sobre el estado general del paciente y los tratamientos realizados cita tras cita. Existen legislaciones específicas en México que orientan al estomatólogo sobre los componentes mínimos necesarios que una nota de evolución debe tener; sin embargo, una de las omisiones más comunes de los odontólogos es que, por desconocimiento, no se dé la debida importancia a la elaboración de una adecuada nota de evolución, aumentando el riesgo de problemas legales. El objetivo del presente artículo es analizar la importancia de las notas de evolución dentro del expediente clínico, destacando su importancia clínica y legal (AU)
The clinical file is considered a document of medical and legal importance where the data necessary to record the diagnosis and the treatments performed on each patient are integrated. One of the most important elements within the clinical records are the medical charts, documents through which de dentist reports on the general condition of the patient and the treatments performed appointment after appointment. There are specific laws in Mexico that guide the stomatologist on the minimum necessary components that a medical chart must have, however, one of the most common omissions of dentist is that, due to ignorance, due importance is not given to the preparation of an adequate medical chart, increasing the risk of legal problems. The aim of this article is to analyze the importance of the evolution charts within the clinical records, highlighting their clinical and legal importance (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dental Records , Medical Records , Forensic Dentistry , Health-Disease Process , Dental Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Legislation, Dental , MexicoABSTRACT
El odontólogo tiene especiales obligaciones y responsabilidades que se encuentran claramente descritas en nuestra legislación. Por desgracia, es una realidad que la odontología legal es un área que comúnmente no se incluye en el plan de estudios de la licenciatura en odontología, lo que produce, como consecuencia, que los odontólogos desconozcan en gran parte sus derechos y obligaciones ante el Estado y frente a sus pacientes. El objetivo del presente artículo es indagar sobre los tópicos más relevantes de odontología legal mediante una revisión de la literatura y de conformidad con las legislaciones vigentes en la República Mexicana (AU)
The dentist has specific obligations and responsobilities that are clearly described in our legislation, and unfortunately it is a reality, that legal odontology is an area that is not commonly included in the curriculum of the dental degree, which results in dentists largely unaware of their rights and obligations against the State and against their patients. The aim of this article is to investigate the most relevant topics of legal odontology through a review of the literature and in accordance with the laws in force in the Mexican Republic (AU)
Subject(s)
Forensic Dentistry , Legislation, Dental , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Liability, Legal , Dental Offices/legislation & jurisprudence , MexicoABSTRACT
Introdução: O procedimento denominado de bichectomia consiste na remoção parcial de uma estrutura adiposa na região das bochechas e ganhou recente popularidade entre a classe odontológica, que passou a executá-lo amplamente, com demandas predominantemente estéticas e, com isso, dúvidas e incertezas surgiram a respeito dos seus aspectos éticos e legais. Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi buscar legislações nacionais, bem como normativas e resoluções emitidas por conselhos profissionais, visando abordar tais controvérsias, alumiando os profissionais quanto à legitimidade do procedimento. Resultados: Verificou-se que desde 1978, os Conselhos Federais de Medicina e de Odontologia vêm emitindo resoluções para determinar limiares de atuação profissional, em especial, com enfoque na especialidade Cirurgia e Traumatologia Bucomaxilofacial, visto que é a especialidade odontológica clínica que mais se aproxima de campos de atuação médica. Com o tempo, estes Conselhos foram atualizando estas Resoluções, tendo em vista os avanços técnicos e científicos da área, porém todas as resoluções analisadas são unânimes em afirmar que a realização de bichectomia com finalidade estritamente estética é atribuição médica. Conclusão: Desta forma, com base nos documentos atualmente vigentes, verifica-se que o cirurgião-dentista que estiver disposto a realizar a cirurgia de bichectomia com finalidade exclusivamente estética estará incorrendo em transgressões administrativas e, consequentemente, tais interpretações podem ser vislumbradas em outras esferas (cíveis e criminais).
Introduction: Bichectomy consists of removing part of a fat structure in the region of the cheeks, and it recently gained popularity in the field of odontology, which began to widely perform the procedure, with predominantly aesthetic demands and, with that, doubts and uncertainties arose with respect to its ethical and legal aspects. Objective: The objective of this work was to seek national laws, as well as normative and resolutions issued by professional councils, aiming to address such controversies, enlightening professionals to the legitimacy of the procedure. Results: Since 1978, the Federal Councils of Medicine and Dentistry have issued resolutions to determine thresholds for professional performance, which particularly focused on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology because it is the closest clinical dental specialty of medical practice. Over time, these Councils have been updating these resolutions, considering the technical and scientific advances of the area, but all the resolutions analyzed were unanimous in affirming that the accomplishment of bichectomy with a strictly aesthetic purpose is a medical attribution. Conclusion: Subsequently, based on the documents currently in force, it is verified that the dental surgeon who is willing to perform bichectomy surgery for aesthetic purposes will be incur administrative infractions and, consequently, such interpretations can be seen in other legal areas (civil and criminal).
Subject(s)
Humans , History, 21st Century , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Surgery, Plastic , Cheek , Dentistry , Esthetics , Forensic Dentistry , Legislation, Dental , Mouth Abnormalities , Surgical Procedures, Operative/legislation & jurisprudence , Surgical Procedures, Operative/ethics , Surgery, Plastic/legislation & jurisprudence , Cheek/surgery , Dentistry/organization & administration , Forensic Dentistry/legislation & jurisprudence , Legislation, Dental/organization & administration , Legislation, Dental/ethics , Mouth Abnormalities/surgeryABSTRACT
Most of the techniques used in endodontic treatment are limited to the internal space to the tooth, avoiding reaching the periapical region. However, some accidents can happen, such as fracture of endodontic instruments, perforation, leakage of material, tooth fracture among others, depending on the complexityof each case. The aim of this study was to report a case involving a tooth loss caused by root perforation. In this case, the patient filed a lawsuit against the former professional who had performed endodontic treatment requiring compensation for moral and material damages. In conclusion, the practice endodontic the clarification of the risks is crucial, considering the particularities of each case. Thus, it is suggested that the verbal and written information should be offered to patients.
La mayoría de las técnicas usadas en el tratamiento de endodoncia son limitadas hacia la cavidad dentinaria pulpar coronal y el canal radicular, evitándose alcanzar la región periapical alveolar. Sin embargo, algunos accidentes pueden ocurrir, tales como: fracturas de instrumentos de endodoncia, perforaciones radiculares, extravasación del material de obturación y fracturas dentarias entre otros. Cada uno involucra una respectiva complejidad. El objetivo de esta publicación fue reportar un caso donde ocurrió la pérdida de un diente permanente causado por una perforación radicular. En este caso la paciente presentó una demanda contra el profesional quién realizó el tratamiento de endodoncia, solicitando una compensación por daños morales y materiales. Se concluye que en la práctica de endodoncia, la especificación de los riesgos es crucial, considerándose las particularidades de cada caso. Así, se sugiere que una buena información verbal y escrita deberá ser proporcionada al paciente.
